|
||||
|
Episode II: Production Issues Strike Back |
||||
|
Page 3 |
GPO requires that all vendors perform a preflight of
all electronic government furnished materials (EGFM) submitted by the
Government. The following language is usually included in all GPO contracts
that use EGFM.
Unfortunately, OG applications do not have preflight
capabilities built-in to the software. Why? The primary reason is because
OG applications are not designed as a print publishing tool. To make
matters worse, the third party programs that are designed for Preflight
(e.g., Preflight Pro, FlightCheck) do not currently support OG files.
[At the time of this publishing, only Markzware's FlightCheck Classic
(Macintosh version) provides support for OG files. This application
supports MS Word files only (Mac or Windows.)] Consequently, vendors
have no defined way to perform a check of any OG files. In other words,
there is no way for the commercial print community to perform the required
check of EGFM if the material is from an OG application.
Most successful EGFM submissions are composed of three parts: 1) Layout file, 2) Supporting graphics 3) Supporting fonts. Without all three, it is common for problems to occur at output. Understanding this need to collect all information, developers of PG software have included "Collect for Output " or "Save for Service Provider " features into their products. These features automatically copy the main layout file, any necessary fonts, and all used graphics to a secondary location (e.g., removable disk). All elements are collected automatically, requiring little or no intervention by the customer. OG applications, on the other hand, do not have any feature that allows for packaging an EGFM submission. Users of OG applications must manually copy all necessary elements to a secondary drive for submission of EGFM to GPO. Since many publications use multiple fonts and graphics, it is common for customers to omit a required font and/or graphic. These omissions occur frequently with OG files.
Besides being used as layout applications, OG software is frequently used to create images, charts, artwork, and other graphic elements. Again, let us refer to our opening quote on page one: "OG applications are incompatible with commercial offset printing." Therefore, using Excel to create a chart or graph, even if the graph is cut and pasted into a page layout program, is a recipe for failure. OG clip art, even art that was supplied with the application, is also known to cause problems. Why all the problems with OG graphics? Remember the RGB issues from earlier? The same issues exist in any graphical element created in OG applications. Other issues exist as well. Stroke weights (the thickness of lines in charts and graphs) are typically ill defined by OG applications for high-resolution output. In many cases, the rules are so thin as to be virtually invisible when output at 1200 DPI or higher. What else? OG applications do not typically support
export to either .EPS or .TIFF graphic file formats. As mentioned earlier
in this article, the printing industry provides support primarily for
.EPS and .TIFF, while other formats cause output problems. Since graphics
from OG applications can not be saved in an appropriate format (without
considerable work), many vendors will fail to properly RIP any embedded
or cut and pasted graphic that originated in an OG application.
Click on the "next" icon below to continue...
|
|||
|
This
article pertains to:
|
||||
|
|
||||